advertisement
Banner
advertisement
Banner
advertisement
Banner
advertisement
Banner
advertisement
Banner
  • Index
  • Topic View
  • Users
  • Search

mercuryl
New member
ranks
useravatar
User Info

tummy tuck

I'd love one of these as soon as I lose about 50 pounds.


Administrator has disabled public posting
ladybug
Member
ranks
useravatar
User Info

Re: tummy tuck

Hi Mercuryl,  I'm totally ignorant about this stuff. I was under the impression that you didn't have to lose weight to have this procedure done; I thought the idea was that one would get the tummy tuck done in order to lose the weight.  Could you fill in my knowledge gaps?  Thanks!!!


Administrator has disabled public posting
poster25
Member
ranks ranks
useravatar
User Info

Re: tummy tuck

1.I have always been told by my doctor that I have to lose weight first in order for any major surgery to be safe.

2. It affects the cost. The more fat, the more you have to pay.  You should lose as much weight as you can by yourself.  Then you will not have to pay as much for the procedure.

3. I have heard that many use this procedure just as a finishing touch ....after a large amount of weight has been lost.


Administrator has disabled public posting
Thermos
Member
ranks ranks
useravatar
User Info

Re: tummy tuck

Thanks, Poster25, losing before a tummy tuck really makes some sense now. I remember asking my mom why we had to pick up for the cleaning lady...wasn't that suppose to be her job?


Administrator has disabled public posting
ladybug
Member
ranks
useravatar
User Info

Re: tummy tuck

Oh yeah, I remember being a bit bewildered at the idea of cleaning up for the cleaning lady, but it does make sense.  The less the cleaning lady has to do, the less you have to pay.  The less excess fat the surgeon has to take off, the less you have to pay.


Administrator has disabled public posting

Board Info

Board Stats:   Total Users: 82   Total Topics: 4   Total Polls: 0   Total Posts: 312   Posts this week: 1
User Info:   Newest User :  HelenaBaldwin  
Generated in 0.061 sec. Queries: 32